Comments on: Tips and tricks: How do I properly refer to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 in documentation and when conversing with fellow users and customers? http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/ Red Hat Magazine Fri, 8 Aug 2008 20:39:15 +0000 http://lyceum.ibiblio.org/?v=1.0.2 by: RHEL http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-97964 Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:30:25 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-97964 Speaking of RH weirdness, why did the RH version scheme go ..., 7.2, 8, 9 and then suddenly back down to 2.1? Speaking of RH weirdness, why did the RH version scheme go …, 7.2, 8, 9 and then suddenly back down to 2.1?

]]> by: 451 CAOS Theory » Red Hat branding police outlaws RHEL http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-95340 Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:29:03 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-95340 [...] One of the implications of this new ruling is revealed by the snappy title of the article in question: “Tips and tricks: How do I properly refer to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 in documentation and when conversing with fellow users and customers?” [...] […] One of the implications of this new ruling is revealed by the snappy title of the article in question: “Tips and tricks: How do I properly refer to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 in documentation and when conversing with fellow users and customers?” […]

]]> by: Christian Söderlund http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-88274 Thu, 22 May 2008 03:58:50 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-88274 RHEL is not proper? Ok then I'm not proper. The way Red Hat could act properly towards customers is to go back to one single "distribution" of each version and then sell different support packages as much as you like. ..and let us continue to use: RHEL3, RHEL4, RHEL5, RHEL6..... RHEL is not proper? Ok then I’m not proper.

The way Red Hat could act properly towards customers is to go back to one single “distribution” of each version and then sell different support packages as much as you like.

..and let us continue to use:
RHEL3, RHEL4, RHEL5, RHEL6…..

]]> by: Mick Russom http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-72509 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:45:04 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-72509 Retarded. Everyone calls it RHEL. Get over it. The RHEL-repackagers expose the stupidity in creating strata in a product line. Its RHEL. There is no Desktop. There is no Server. There is no Advanced Server. I think RHEL should be offered as Redhat used to be: One size fits all OS, with install profiles being the only difference. The license is simply an un-enforced right to use. Retarded. Everyone calls it RHEL. Get over it.

The RHEL-repackagers expose the stupidity in creating strata in a product line. Its RHEL. There is no Desktop. There is no Server. There is no Advanced Server. I think RHEL should be offered as Redhat used to be: One size fits all OS, with install profiles being the only difference. The license is simply an un-enforced right to use.

]]> by: Lamont http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-67784 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:08:38 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-67784 The pleasant thing about using CentOS is that they remove all of redhat's marketing B.S. Rearranging RHEL5 into Desktop and Server and breaking out the RPM repos on the CD to separate Server, Cluster, ClusterStorage and Virtualization was just annoying. I don't know why anyone pays redhat for the privilege of dealing with the latest way their marketing department wants to mess with the O/S. The pleasant thing about using CentOS is that they remove all of redhat’s marketing B.S.

Rearranging RHEL5 into Desktop and Server and breaking out the RPM repos on the CD to separate Server, Cluster, ClusterStorage and Virtualization was just annoying.

I don’t know why anyone pays redhat for the privilege of dealing with the latest way their marketing department wants to mess with the O/S.

]]> by: Sim http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-65708 Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:23:25 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-65708 I have nothing to add here but just want to show RH that people do care about such stupidities. Please joint the Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate PR guys... I have nothing to add here but just want to show RH that people do care about such stupidities. Please joint the Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate PR guys…

]]> by: Matthew Flaschen http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-63432 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:09:15 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-63432 If it is never correct to use RHEL, why is it in the URL of this page? If it is never correct to use RHEL, why is it in the URL of this page?

]]> by: john http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-63287 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:26:04 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-63287 that's what was said about s.o.l. and shit out of luck. but look how that turned out. i guess you're, well, s.o.l. with people not using rhel. that’s what was said about s.o.l. and shit out of luck. but look how that turned out. i guess you’re, well, s.o.l. with people not using rhel.

]]> by: Martin Mares http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-60008 Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:26:40 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-60008 It is never correct... How do you prove this theorem? :-) It is never correct… How do you prove this theorem? :-)

]]> by: RH employee http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-58522 Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:28:29 +0000 http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/04/tips-and-tricks-rhel-ref/#comment-58522 I can't believe this is still up. It's very embarrassing. I suspect most Red Hat employees, like me, believe that such mandates are counter to our culture of freedom. I can’t believe this is still up. It’s very embarrassing. I suspect most Red Hat employees, like me, believe that such mandates are counter to our culture of freedom.

]]>