<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="lyceum/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tips and tricks:  yum-security</title>
	<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/</link>
	<description>Red Hat Magazine</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 08:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://lyceum.ibiblio.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Indy</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-58869</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-58869</guid>
					<description>I realize RHEL 3 and 4 don't come stock w/ YUM but if you install YUM yourself on these versions what specifically prohibits you from using this there?  Is it that RH doesn't have the necessary content for those versions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize RHEL 3 and 4 don&#8217;t come stock w/ YUM but if you install YUM yourself on these versions what specifically prohibits you from using this there?  Is it that RH doesn&#8217;t have the necessary content for those versions?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ciphernaut</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-56563</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-56563</guid>
					<description>@indy

RHEL3 and 4 use up2date instead of yum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@indy</p>
<p>RHEL3 and 4 use up2date instead of yum.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: covex</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-56540</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-56540</guid>
					<description>Is it possible to place this option somehow in yum.conf?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to place this option somehow in yum.conf?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Indy</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-49371</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-49371</guid>
					<description>Why is this limited to RHEL 5 only?  If you install the latest yum distro on RHEL 4 or 3 would it work?  Is RH specifically limiting content to the RHEL 5 channels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this limited to RHEL 5 only?  If you install the latest yum distro on RHEL 4 or 3 would it work?  Is RH specifically limiting content to the RHEL 5 channels?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Γριφεγ Γθωαφ</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-48396</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-48396</guid>
					<description>Thank you. I commented too early. I tried installing yum-security on Fedora, but this happened:

[root@localhost ~]# yum install yum-security
livna-development         100% &#124;=========================&#124; 2.1 kB    00:00    
adobe-linux-i386          100% &#124;=========================&#124;  951 B    00:00    
development               100% &#124;=========================&#124; 2.2 kB    00:00    
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package yum-security available.
Nothing to do
[root@localhost ~]# 

But later on it worked. At first I thought it's not available, but it must have been a glitch with a mirror.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. I commented too early. I tried installing yum-security on Fedora, but this happened:</p>
<p>[root@localhost ~]# yum install yum-security<br />
livna-development         100% |=========================| 2.1 kB    00:00<br />
adobe-linux-i386          100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00<br />
development               100% |=========================| 2.2 kB    00:00<br />
Setting up Install Process<br />
Parsing package install arguments<br />
No package yum-security available.<br />
Nothing to do<br />
[root@localhost ~]# </p>
<p>But later on it worked. At first I thought it&#8217;s not available, but it must have been a glitch with a mirror.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve Bonneville</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-48284</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-48284</guid>
					<description>As Rahul mentioned, this has been in Fedora since about Fedora 7, so yes, it can work with yum repositories.  The yum-security package is included in Fedora 8.

However, when creating yum repositories, there are no tags in an RPM packages's metadata that store the information about the CVEs / Advisories  / Bugzilla bugs fixed by a package (or more likely, a SET of packages, which complicates the issue even more).  So, you can't regenerate this information automatically with createrepo.  For Fedora, the updateinfo.xml.gz file which contains this information is managed, generated, and inserted into the updates repository by the open source system used by contributors to manage package updates, bodhi. 

The Scientific Linux repository Troy tested in his comment above probably doesn't have an updateinfo.xml.gz file in their repository, so the information isn't available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Rahul mentioned, this has been in Fedora since about Fedora 7, so yes, it can work with yum repositories.  The yum-security package is included in Fedora 8.</p>
<p>However, when creating yum repositories, there are no tags in an RPM packages&#8217;s metadata that store the information about the CVEs / Advisories  / Bugzilla bugs fixed by a package (or more likely, a SET of packages, which complicates the issue even more).  So, you can&#8217;t regenerate this information automatically with createrepo.  For Fedora, the updateinfo.xml.gz file which contains this information is managed, generated, and inserted into the updates repository by the open source system used by contributors to manage package updates, bodhi. </p>
<p>The Scientific Linux repository Troy tested in his comment above probably doesn&#8217;t have an updateinfo.xml.gz file in their repository, so the information isn&#8217;t available.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rahul Sundaram</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-48248</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-48248</guid>
					<description>It has been available in Fedora for a while as part of yum-utils package FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been available in Fedora for a while as part of yum-utils package FYI.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Γριφεγ Γθωαφ</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-47343</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-47343</guid>
					<description>Any hope this will be available for Fedora?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any hope this will be available for Fedora?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-47161</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-47161</guid>
					<description>Does this work with Satellite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this work with Satellite?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dulles</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-47099</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/01/16/tips-and-tricks-yum-security/#comment-47099</guid>
					<description>REDHAT HAS UPDATED YUM?

That's great news. Now the RHEL 5.1 account I just canceled might actually update my systems without a screen-full of yum "dependency" errors?

You Redhat programmers are really good, and smart. My 5.0 version of "Software Updater" has absolutely no menu or features on the GUI (never did).

This reminds me of the RHEL 4.5 "Print Manager" with no menu or features on the GUI. Redhat just lost another customer (since RH8), and it's business as usual.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REDHAT HAS UPDATED YUM?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s great news. Now the RHEL 5.1 account I just canceled might actually update my systems without a screen-full of yum &#8220;dependency&#8221; errors?</p>
<p>You Redhat programmers are really good, and smart. My 5.0 version of &#8220;Software Updater&#8221; has absolutely no menu or features on the GUI (never did).</p>
<p>This reminds me of the RHEL 4.5 &#8220;Print Manager&#8221; with no menu or features on the GUI. Redhat just lost another customer (since RH8), and it&#8217;s business as usual.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
