<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="lyceum/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Summit 2007:  Alan Dechert of the Open Voting Consortium</title>
	<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/05/11/summit-2007-alan-dechert-of-the-open-voting-consortium/</link>
	<description>Red Hat Magazine</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 08:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://lyceum.ibiblio.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: chitrank</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/05/11/summit-2007-alan-dechert-of-the-open-voting-consortium/#comment-78102</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 02:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/05/11/summit-2007-alan-dechert-of-the-open-voting-consortium/#comment-78102</guid>
					<description>plz send me a latest dummps &#38; question of linux in my yahoo id. After solve dumps i will give the linux exam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>plz send me a latest dummps &amp; question of linux in my yahoo id. After solve dumps i will give the linux exam.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Dechert</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/05/11/summit-2007-alan-dechert-of-the-open-voting-consortium/#comment-12786</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/05/11/summit-2007-alan-dechert-of-the-open-voting-consortium/#comment-12786</guid>
					<description>I thought the Bilderberg question was very interesting -- highly relevant to the question of transparency in government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Bilderberg question was very interesting &#8212; highly relevant to the question of transparency in government.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Burger</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/05/11/summit-2007-alan-dechert-of-the-open-voting-consortium/#comment-9835</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 03:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/05/11/summit-2007-alan-dechert-of-the-open-voting-consortium/#comment-9835</guid>
					<description>I enjoyed the article.  But why the 'out of the blue' Bilderberg question?  I know we're a bunch of geeks, and I don't mind that label too much.  But let's not allow ourselves to be labeled kooks as well.

Put on your tinfoil hats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the article.  But why the &#8216;out of the blue&#8217; Bilderberg question?  I know we&#8217;re a bunch of geeks, and I don&#8217;t mind that label too much.  But let&#8217;s not allow ourselves to be labeled kooks as well.</p>
<p>Put on your tinfoil hats.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dale Axelrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/05/11/summit-2007-alan-dechert-of-the-open-voting-consortium/#comment-6332</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 19:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/05/11/summit-2007-alan-dechert-of-the-open-voting-consortium/#comment-6332</guid>
					<description>Verifygra™ — FAIL-SAFE VOTING (in a nutshell):  It’s as simple as 1,2,3

1 — OPEN (OR DISCLOSED) SOURCE SOFTWARE: All electronic voting 		machines and tabulation devices must use open (or disclosed) source software.

2 — PAPER BALLOT: All election technology must allow a voter to
	(a) mark (by hand or machine) an optically-scannable paper ballot,
	(b) inspect their ballot to confirm their vote, and
	(c) physically place their ballot in a ballot box which undergoes secure, rigorous chain-of-custody safeguards.

3 — 10% RANDOM HAND COUNT IN EACH PRECINCT: 
		All electronic tallies (from machines which have printed or otherwise provided ballots AND/OR independently-programmed tabulation devices which have optically scanned said ballots) in an election MUST be verified by publicly hand counting a randomly selected 10% of the ballots cast in each precinct.

For links and details: http://www.verifygra.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verifygra™ — FAIL-SAFE VOTING (in a nutshell):  It’s as simple as 1,2,3</p>
<p>1 — OPEN (OR DISCLOSED) SOURCE SOFTWARE: All electronic voting 		machines and tabulation devices must use open (or disclosed) source software.</p>
<p>2 — PAPER BALLOT: All election technology must allow a voter to<br />
	(a) mark (by hand or machine) an optically-scannable paper ballot,<br />
	(b) inspect their ballot to confirm their vote, and<br />
	(c) physically place their ballot in a ballot box which undergoes secure, rigorous chain-of-custody safeguards.</p>
<p>3 — 10% RANDOM HAND COUNT IN EACH PRECINCT:<br />
		All electronic tallies (from machines which have printed or otherwise provided ballots AND/OR independently-programmed tabulation devices which have optically scanned said ballots) in an election MUST be verified by publicly hand counting a randomly selected 10% of the ballots cast in each precinct.</p>
<p>For links and details: <a href="http://www.verifygra.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.verifygra.com/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
